Showing posts with label #RiskReduction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #RiskReduction. Show all posts

Friday, October 9, 2015

HIV Medication: From AZT to the 'One Pill A Day' in 3 Decades




The first six years of AIDS (1981-1987) saw more than 40,000 deaths and 50,000 new infections without any FDA approved drug therapy. In 1987, Azidothymidine (aka AZT or Retovir) became an answer to the staggering numbers of deaths from AIDS and new HIV infections over the last several years. AZT had a previously pharmaceutical use as an early anti-Cancer fighting agent known decades earlier as Compound S. AZT was hurried through the FDA hoops and hurdles in an unprecedented 25 months and “marked the introduction of the first effective weapon against the virus [HIV] and AIDS itself, what eventually would become a key element of the multi-drug cocktail of HAART itself.” (1)

AZT is not without its controversy that cannot be overlooked. In short, thousands of people were suffering and dying from AIDS in such short periods that a drug therapy had to be offered. AZT offered no cure and little to more than a year or so prolonged life to those suffering; consequently, its cost was astronomical at $10,000 dollars for a year’s therapy. AZT’s efficacy is a double-edged sword. The drug helps to prevent the HIV virus from invading, genetically altering T cells; however, the drug at high doses inhibits healthy cell division creating a myriad of health concerns. Drug resistance to AZT is common and is not tolerated well by most.  AZT as a singular drug therapy is rarely prescribed since the introduction of HAART (highly active antiretroviral therapy).  (1)

HAART
In 1996, fifteen years into the AIDS crisis, HAART revolutionized the HIV era by presenting multiple drug regimens meant to enhance the healing effects of AZT (often listed in drug cocktails as Retovir). HAART has expanded to include six classes of drugs that stops the genetic replication of the HIV viron, lowering the viral load to an undetectable level, as well as, decreases the ability for the virus to continue to alter itself into more strains than already identified. 
Since the introduction of HAART, the classes of drug therapies continue to become more robust than ever with more than 30 approved drugs in 6 different classes. With such a large selection of therapies to test and try, it helps to deal with those who build up drug resistance. Along with a wide selection of drug therapies the more recent additions have decreased side-effects and less strict dosing provisions. The most exciting is the ‘One Pill a Day’ options (All in One Combination Tablets), which is a HAART cocktail in one pill and taken once a day. This is a blessing to those of us whom have never had to take anything other than one pill a day and those who have had to take common cocktails of 5 to 10 pills throughout the day on a strict schedule. 

Currently Approved Drugs for HIV
HIV is a retrovirus: a virus that needs a host to invade and, through genetic mutation, replicate itself.  HIV drug therapies are called antiretrovirals because they attack the HIV retrovirus and they are highly effective (active). HAART drugs have a corresponding stage of HIV replication in which the drugs in that class target. The six classes of HAART are (as of March 2015):
  • 4 All in One Combination Tablets (Multiclass Combination Products)
  • 11 Protease Inhibitors (PIs)
  • 11 Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NRTIs)
  • 5 Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NNRTIs)
  • 2 Early Inhibitors including Fusion Inhibitors
  • 2 Integrase Inhibitors
The connection between the phase of HIV replication and corresponding HAART drug needs an understanding of the 8 stages of the HIV replication process, which will be discussed in another blog. This should, if anything else shows the progression from a poisonous cancer fighting drug that often did more damage than good, to multiple all in one tablet options, and, hopefully, the cure will be in our future. To find a comparative chart of FDA approved drugs: CLICK HERE.



Bryan Heitz
Risk Reduction Specialist

 


Monday, July 27, 2015

Meet Our Staff: Bryan Heitz

Today is the third installment of "Meet Our Staff," as we're excited to introduce you to CCC's first-ever Risk Reduction Specialist, Bryan!

 


Name: BRYAN HEITZ

What do you do at CCC? 

Currently, I am the HIV Risk Reduction Specialist at CCC. My program is Health Education and Risk Reduction (HE/RR) with a focus on educating people living with HIV (PLWH) in a myriad of areas (dealing with HIV related stigma, drug adherence, risk reduction, transmission, etc.). I work primarily with PLWH who are newly diagnosed, long-term survivors, and those returning to care. I am also responsible for critical, inclusive HIV education within the agency and in the community as a whole.

How long have you been at CCC?

I am three months away from my 1st anniversary at CCC. 

Where are you from originally?

I was born in a small mid-west town named Wabash, IN (most notably for the Wabash Cannonball, being the first electrically lighted city, and the hometown of Crystal Gayle). I grew up with a hippie, nomad mother who moved to and from California often, so I grew up in Mojave, CA and Wabash, IN.
 
What is your favorite vacation spot?
 
I love to travel and am looking forward to embarking on future international travels. In the U.S., my favorite place (vacation or not) is New Orleans. My heart lives in NOLA, and my soul dances to the blues and jazz of that region. I hear the city calling now...

What is your favorite food? 

I have been vegetarian/vegan for almost 25 years. However, this does not mean that I live on salads and tofu alone. My favorite foods come from my two favorite cuisines: Thai and Mediterranean.

Who is someone you look up to or admire and why?
 
The pianist/vocalist/artist/warrior, Diamanda Galas, is someone I truly admire. She has immersed herself in the HIV/AIDS community from the time of the "Plague," through losing family and friends to AIDS, and still fights for PLWH today. She has risen from personal adversity and struggles to become a warrior for us living with HIV and any other marginalized and oppressed group. She exemplifies everything I find admirable, and I am lucky to call her my heroine and dear friend!

What do you enjoy doing in your spare time?
 
Art, film, and music account for most of my spare time. I spend a lot of my spare time in a space of creativity... writing, photography, and mixed-media art. I also enjoy communing with nature by hiking and exploring the beauty around Las Vegas and Nevada.

What is your favorite place in Las Vegas?

Most of my favorite places are outside of Vegas proper. I try to spend as much time as I can exploring and hiking among Valley of Fire, Red Rock Canyon, and Mt. Charleston. Nevada is full of unique and fascinating day trip destinations to ghost towns, natural springs, etc. that it is a shame to stay in the city when weather permits being outside. In the city, the Wetlands is one of my favorite nature spots to go... It is an unexpected and vibrant getaway from the urban jungle.
 
If you could have any animal as a pet, what would you choose and why?

I have had (or my family has had) plenty of usual and unusual animals throughout my life: skunks, raccoons, fox, scorpions, tarantulas, chinchilla, turtles, rabbits, Burmese Python, spider monkey, dogs and cats (my favorites). If I could have any other animal for a pet, it would be a desert tortoise or a pink flamingo. A desert tortoise because they are almost mythical to me (I've yet to find one in the desert); a pink flamingo because... well, it's a pink flamingo and an ode to John Waters!
 
What would you choose as a career if you were not in this field?

I am committed to critical, inclusive community education related to social justice and equality. However, if I were not in this field, I would definitely be in a more creative arena. I have, in the past, flirted with Interior Design & Costume Design and could see either of those as careers. In dreams, I write screenplays and direct documentaries and art house films... maybe one day dreams will be reality.

What is your favorite thing about working at CCC?

My favorite thing about working at CCC is my ability to make a difference in someone's life and their continued survival with HIV. My goal as a facilitator of education is to empower individuals in order for them to be better consumers of information, to elicit an internal change, and to educate those around them by disseminating critical and accurate information in hopes of neutralizing and de-stigmatizing HIV as an illness.

What words of wisdom do you have to share?
 
One of my favorite quotes from one of my favorite thinkers:
 
"The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself." - Friedrich Nietzsche

Friday, July 17, 2015

Serodiscordant Relationships: What You Need To Know

Viral Suppression, Risk, and Serodiscordant Relationships: Should Serodiscordant couples practice safer sex practices? What's the real-life risk of HIV transmission? 



Remember seroconversion from your HIV 101: the physiological conversion from being HIV negative to becoming HIV positive. HIV statuses are reported in terms of positive and negative. Thus, Serodiscordant couples, also referred to as Magnetic Relationships, are those couples where one partner is HIV and the other partner is HIV +.

As we enter the fourth generation of HIV, we are surviving the disease and living longer lives than those in previous generations. Along with this amazing gift of survival, HIV positive men and women are faced with a myriad of new issues including mixed-status dating and relationships, creating a number of Serodiscordant couples. Serodiscordant couples are presented with a unique set of circumstances to circumvent in order to have an open relationship and a healthy, safe sex life. 

In a 2013 article, John Sovec discusses how Serodiscordant couples are faced with more anxiety and fear than many relationships due to the fear of unintentional HIV transmission: often both the positive partner fears transmitting HIV and the negative partner fears becoming infected. Other challenges include worries regarding HIV care if the positive partner becomes sick, finding psychosocial support for both partners (more services available for the negative partner in a Serodiscordant relationship are needed), and issues of disclosure (who do you tell that your partner is positive?) to name a few. Creating an open dialogue is crucial for any healthy long-lasting relationship; however, it may be more crucial for Serodiscordant couples due to the health risks involved in keeping secrets and lack of communication. "These worries can create a barrier to true intimacy and leave each partner feeling unfulfilled. This is a time when each partner must risk talking about his or her needs, what forms of sexual contact feel safest, likes and dislikes, and how the couple can find ways to keep their sex life active and intriguing."

Are safer sex practices necessary in a Serodiscordant relationship if the HIV positive partner is in treatment, seen regularly by a doctor, and is undetectable? 

 Serodiscordant couples persist with a silent goal in mind: to keep the HIV negative partner negative and to keep the HIV positive partner healthy and undetectable. The goal of becoming undetectable, or viral suppression, is two-fold. One, viral suppression is key in HIV positive people to maintain a healthy CD-4 count, an undetectable HIV viral load, and long-term survival. Second, viral suppression is integral to HIV Prevention due to the fact that having an undetectable viral load carries a low to no risk of HIV transmission depending upon the research. 

Research conducted and reported upon over the last several years regarding Serodiscordant couples and HIV transmission, when the HIV positive partner is undetectable, cumulatively suggest that the real life transmission of HIV between mixed-status partners is extremely low to none. Most recently, the PARTNER study (a study on HIV transmission among Serodiscordant couples where viral suppression is reached in the HIV positive partner) reported on their findings after the first 2-year mark (the full report will be expected in 2017 after the final phase of the study is complete). The findings are remarkable and may offer astounding news about preventing HIV transmission with or without condom use. The unique thing about this study in regard to many earlier studies is that both heterosexual and homosexual couples and sex are included in this study: data from over one thousand mixed-status couples and thirty thousand sexual encounters were collected. Two years into the study, not one instance of HIV has been transmitted regardless of condom use, regardless of whether the couples engaged in anal or vaginal sex. The study also reports that the maximum chance of HIV transmission during viral suppression is 1% for anal sex (insertive or receptive) and 4% for anal sex with ejaculation (with a receptive negative partner). "When asked what the study tells us about the chance of someone with an undetectable viral load transmitting HIV, presenter Alison Rodger said: Our best estimate is it's zero." 



Does this mean that those of us in Serodiscordant relationships can toss out the condoms? Not necessarily; however, this is extremely optimistic and viral suppression may be one of our greatest weapons in the arsenal to contain HIV and move closer to the goal of an AIDS-free generation. It is imperative to remember that open and honest communication regarding condoms, unprotected sex, and risk associated with various sexual acts, etc. is necessary for Serodiscordant couples to make their own decisions based on facts and personal decisions. Ultimately, it is up to the individuals within the couple and centers on the HIV positive partner's adherence history and viral load.

Personally, my partner and I have been together for nearly 8 years. We began dating less than a year following my HIV diagnosis. To this day my partner is HIV negative. I become livid when it is assumed that he is HIV positive simply because I am and we are in a relationship. I do not become upset out of shame or fear, but because of the ignorance in that assumption: it is impossible for two mixed-status individuals to have a healthy, 'normal' long-term sexual relationship without both ending up HIV positive. Yet, this assumption is partly to blame for why we see young gay men seek out HIV infection; why some HIV allow themselves to seroconvert (become HIV +); and why PrEP is being peddled to Serodiscordant couples. 

Hopefully research will continue to support the findings of low to no risk of HIV infection with ART therapy & viral suppression and HIV concerns will no longer be a part of the equation for love and healthy relationships. 


For further reading: 

Should HIV Serodiscordant Couples Always Take Preventative Measures? Experts Debate

Undetectable Viral Load Essentially Eliminates HIV Transmission Risk in Straight Couples 


Bryan C. Heitz
Risk Reduction Specialist
Community Counseling Center  

Friday, May 15, 2015

What Does HIV Prevention Really Mean?


 
 
 
HIV prevention is more than basic HIV education (e.g. infectious fluids, transmission routes, risky behaviors, condom use, etc.), it includes Risk Reduction and, the controversial strategy of, Harm Reduction. What does HIV prevention mean, and what is the difference between risk and harm reduction.

***

HIV Prevention focuses on the prevention of new HIV infections with education and risk/harm reduction strategies. HIV transmission occurs through sexual and non-sexual behaviors with varying levels of risk. Sexually, HIV is transmitted through unsafe/unprotected oral, vaginal, anal, or any form of sexual play that involves exposure to HIV infected fluids (blood, semen, vaginal fluids, breast milk, or any bodily fluid that contains HIV-infected blood). Non-sexually, HIV is transmitted through blood-to-blood contact (shared needles used by an HIV-infected individual and, extremely rare, contaminated blood products) and mother-to-child transmission (during pregnancy, delivery, or breastfeeding).
Preventing sexual transmission of HIV involves a number of strategies including safer sex practices, testing, treating STIs, and treatment as prevention. Safer sex practices include limiting the number of sexual partners and unprotected sexual encounters; knowing the risk-level involved in oral, vaginal, and anal sex; and, correct use of condoms from erection to ejaculation. Condom use includes both external (male) and internal (female) condoms (never to be used together), and it is important to note that internal condoms can be used for vaginal sex by women and for anal sex by both women and men.
Regular HIV and STI testing is key in preventing new HIV infections. It was not too long ago that we were advised to get an HIV test once a year. Now, frequency of HIV testing depends upon the quantity of sexual encounters & partners an individual has had; thus, a sexually-active individual not in an honest, monogamous relationship (regardless of age, gender, or sexual identity) should test once every 3 to 6 months.

Treatment as prevention consists of two strategies using antiretroviral therapy (ART) to prevent HIV transmission: PEP and PrEP. PEP, or Post-Exposure Prophylactics, is utilized after an individual has potentially been exposed to HIV in an exposure situation (sexual or non-sexual). PEP is a 4-week daily dose of ART that potentially stops HIV infection and should be started within 72 hours after HIV exposure. PrEP, or Pre-Exposure Prophylactics, is utilized before an individual is potentially exposed to HIV. PrEP is being targeted to at-risk HIV-negative men who have sex with men (MSM). More about this controversial topic shall be addressed in a later blog.

Preventing HIV transmission through blood focuses on screening blood products; reducing the instances of accidental needle sticks in medical settings; and, most importantly, decreasing the sharing of used needles in injection drug use (IDU).
***
 
Risk Reduction is concerned with reducing the actual risk an individual has of acquiring HIV through sexual and non-sexual behaviors. For example, knowing that receptive (bottoming) anal sex (regardless of sexual identity) carries the greatest risk for sexual transmission of HIV, whereas, oral sex (regardless of sexual identity) carries the least risk for sexual transmission of HIV emphasizes risk reduction.
Risk reduction among People living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) focuses on treatment and adherence to HART. The goal of HART for PLWHA is to decrease an individual’s viral load (how many copies of HIV replications per ml of blood) as low as possible, hopefully, until it becomes undetectable (also known as viral suppression). This is an example of using Treatment as prevention and risk reduction.
Although having an undetectable viral load does not mean that HIV is no longer transmittable, it does mean that it is less likely to transmit HIV than an individual without viral suppression. In 2014, the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections stated that researchers “calculated that the average real-world risk reduction as a result of an undetectable viral load would be 95 percent."
 ***
 
Harm Reduction, historically, is concerned with reducing the harms associated with injection drug users (IDU).  The number one non-sexual behavior that carries the most risk for HIV transmission is sharing needles, most commonly, for injection drug use. However, other forms of drug use (smoking, snorting, drinking, etc.) also contribute to the transmission and spread of HIV. Alcohol, marijuana, methamphetamines, and other recreational drugs often impair one’s decision-making skills, decreases inhibitions, and increase the opportunity to engage in sexual or non-sexual risky behaviors that put the individual at risk for HIV transmission and other STIs.
Harm reduction, in terms of reducing non-sexual HIV transmission, should include availability to clean needles and works for IDU. It is more likely that an IDU would use clean needles/works if they are available than an IDU would simply quit injecting drugs.
Harm reduction strategies need to be applied to sexual risks as well. Harm reduction, in terms of sexual HIV transmission, may include getting an individual to move from never using condoms to using condoms for the most risky sexual behaviors (anal and vaginal sex).
***
 
Today we, the diligent community of HIV professional in all areas of the fight, have a myriad of HIV prevention strategies of which we should not take advantage. It is equally important to acknowledge that many of these prevention strategies were not available in the beginning of the aids era more than thirty years ago. Finally, regardless of the prevention, risk reduction, or harm reduction strategy used, one must implement said strategy without judgment, prejudice, or blame.
 

-Bryan Heitz

Risk Reduction Specialist
CCCofSN